Learning Leads Survey

During the project we designed a survey for people with responsibility for workforce development. We did this to help learning leads triangulate perceptions of knowledge and confidence, so they could compare workers' self reflected knowledge levels with their own assessment of the workforce's knowledge.

The survey can be iterated to help you prepare a baseline as you develop a training programme. It can also be used alongside the reflection questions in the training plan.

Q1. In your experience, what has incentivised training in your organisation? What encourages the use of Frameworks in day to day work?

Q2. Are children's rights or the UNCRC referenced in any of your existing training or learning?

Q3. Have you noticed any changes in the prominence of the UNCRC in training in recent years? What examples can you think of

Q4. How do you feel about the following statements in relation to your workforce?

Options: Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree

The children's rights and the UNCRC are integrated into professional training
They are confident with the articles of the UNCRC and which ones are relevant to their work
They are confident with the general principles of the UNCRC and use them in their daily work
They are confident to explain what a children's rights approach is to a colleague
They are confident to analyse their work and its compatibility with the UNCRC and contents of the Act
They are confident to explain what the powers of the regulators are to a colleague
They are confident they know what to do in their job if they see that child's rights are at risk or about to be breached

Q5. Are there any particular roles or sectors that you would like to create a journey through the Framework for?

An icon of a folder with a magnifying glass, with three pages emanating from it.

This is a Scottish Government-funded project. This webpage, and the linked resources within it have not been produced by the Scottish Government and so the Scottish Government cannot guarantee their quality or accuracy. Nothing on this webpage and in its linked resources is intended to constitute legal advice. Readers should seek their own independent legal advice with respect to any legal matter.