Future of Scotland's Commissioner Landscape

Date: 19th November 2024
Category: General measures of implementation, Reporting to and monitoring the UNCRC, Funding

questions.jpg

In a recent parliamentary debate, MSPs reviewed findings from the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s inquiry into Scotland’s growing number of commissioner roles, focusing on issues of cost, accountability, and potential overlap.

Together submitted a response to the inquiry and urged MSPs to protect the independent nature of the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland (CYPCS) as required by the UNCRC and as it provides real value to Scotland’s babies, children and young people in promoting and safeguarding their human rights.

In the debate, representing the Finance and Public Administration Committee, Michael Marra MSP highlighted the need for a “root-and-branch” review to create a clear framework guiding SPCB-supported bodies. He proposed a temporary moratorium on creating or expanding these roles until the review’s completion. Some members, including Sarah Boyack MSP, called for a future-proofed approach that avoids role duplication while enhancing scrutiny and effectiveness.

The debate considered proposals for new roles, such as a Future Generations Commissioner and an Older People’s Commissioner. However, many MSPs expressed concerns over overlapping responsibilities with MSPs and advocacy organisations with members wanting clarification around what a Commissioner's role should be.

There was strong support for the work of Commissioners, including the CYPCS.

With the Scottish Government also reviewing public body structures to enhance efficiency, next steps may include setting up a dedicated committee to conduct a comprehensive review by mid-2025. As discussions continue, MSPs are weighing the value commissioners bring against the need for clarity, accountability, and fiscal responsibility.