The Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration (SCRA) has published a comprehensive report examining whether AI should be used in the Children’s Hearings System, Scotland’s child‑protection and youth‑justice process. The study gathers views from young people, staff, and experts on the ethical, legal, and practical implications of introducing AI.  

Participants recognised that AI could help with practical tasks such as redacting documents, organising information, or analysing large amounts of data. These kinds of tools could ease pressure on staff and free up more time for direct work with children and families. However, the report also highlights deep concerns about fairness, transparency and privacy. Many worry that AI could reinforce existing inequalities, make decisions harder to understand, or weaken the human relationships that are central to the Hearings System. 

Young people stressed that AI should never replace the human connection that helps them feel heard and supported. Instead, they want any technology to be used carefully, with clear safeguards and full transparency about when and how it is involved. 

Overall, the report concludes that AI may have a place in the system, but only in tightly controlled, well‑defined areas, and never in making decisions about children’s lives. It calls for strong oversight, co‑design with those affected, and a commitment to ensuring that technology supports, rather than replaces, the human heart of the Hearings System. 

Read the full report “A Double Edged Sword”